President signs bill to
protect housing allowance for clergy
May 21, 2002
By Tom Strode
WASHINGTON
(BP)--President Bush has signed into law a bill designed to protect a
longstanding housing tax exemption for ordained ministers and other
clergy.
Bush signed the Clergy Housing Allowance Clarification Act May 20 after
the legislation sped through Congress in the face of a judicial challenge
to the exemption's constitutionality. The unusually rapid legislative
action came after a panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
announced in March it was reviewing the constitutionality of the
allowance.
Enactment of the measure came less than six weeks after the bill was
introduced. The measure passed both the Senate and House of
Representatives without opposition. The House adopted it with a 408-0 vote
April 16, while the Senate agreed by unanimous consent to the same bill
May 2.
Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Valley Community Church, a large and
highly influential Southern Baptist church in Lake Forest, Calif., sued
the IRS after an agent assessed his home's value at far less than its
worth and thereby reduced the housing allowance, he said. The IRS
penalized Warren for the years 1993-95 for the difference between the IRS
valuation and the exemption from taxable income he claimed.
"Though it rarely ever happens, it is encouraging when elements of
all three branches of government are in total agreement," Warren said
in a prepared statement. "The Tax Court said we were right. The
Congress and Senate unanimously stood behind us. The Department of Justice
has written a Brief defending our position, and has asked us to join them
in signing a petition to withdraw the IRS's original appeal. And now with
the President signing the bill into law, even he and his staff have
defended our position. I think this has been a fight well worth fighting
and winning for clergy across the country. I'm glad God let me play a part
in it."
Warren thanked the leadership of the Southern Baptist Convention Executive
Committee, the North American Mission Board, Focus on the Family, the
Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability and denominational
leaders across the country for their support.
Since 1921, pastors and other religious leaders have been able to deduct
from federal taxes a portion of their income for housing. The new law is
intended to preserve the exemption by amending the Internal Revenue Code
to make clear the allowance should not exceed the "fair rental
value" of a house, including furnishings, accessories and utilities.
While the bill would not settle the issue of constitutionality, its
supporters believe it will end the Ninth Circuit's threat to the allowance
by codifying the "fair rental value" language formerly used by
the Internal Revenue Service. The legislation would provide a way for both
sides in the Ninth Circuit case to resolve the dispute. It would not
prevent a future challenge to the allowance's constitutionality, however.
Lawyers from the Southern Baptist Convention's Executive Committee,
Annuity Board and Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, as well as
other religious organizations, have worked for the exemption's
preservation.
ERLC President Richard Land said he was "delighted" the
president signed the bill.
"This law will significantly increase the legal protections afforded
the clergy housing allowance, which is something that needs to be
protected from court intrusion," Land said. "I am gratified that
the House and Senate moved with such speed to afford this protection when
it seemed the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was looking with a menacing
eye toward this very important allowance for clergy of all faiths."
Rep. Jim Ramstad, R.-Minn., who introduced the bill April 10, said in a
written statement, "With an overwhelming vote in Congress and the
president's signature, America's clergy and their congregations will be
protected from this destructive tax increase."
The bill would add the following language to the tax code: "And to
the extent such allowance does not exceed the fair rental value of the
home, including furnishings and appurtenances such as a garage, plus the
cost of utilities." The amendment would not apply to taxable years
before 2001. Amended tax returns could be filed without penalty or
interest under the bill.
Abolition of the allowance would have a highly negative impact on pastors
and other clergy, as well as churches and other religious bodies. It has
been estimated loss of the allowance would result in clergy paying an
additional $2.3 billion in taxes during the next five years. It also would
be particularly damaging to small congregations, which often have been
able to employ a full-time pastor because of the housing benefit.
Congress reacted when the Ninth Circuit signaled a likelihood it would
strike down the housing allowance. After the court, which is located in
San Francisco, received the case as an appeal by the IRS, a divided
three-judge panel announced it would consider whether it should weigh the
exemption's constitutionality and, if so, whether the allowance would pass
the test under the First Amendment's ban on government establishment of
religion.
The panel appointed Erwin Chemerinsky, a professor at the University of
Southern California Law School, to write a brief on those issues for the
court. The panel requested both parties in the case to submit briefs as
well. The panel set May deadlines for the briefs. Neither party, however,
challenged the exemption's constitutionality.
In interviews, Chemerinsky said he believes the allowance is invalid.
"Government can't subsidize religion," he told the Los Angeles
Times. "Religion is treated differently by the Constitution. If the
government wants to subsidize journalists because it feels they aren't
paid enough, I don't have any problem with that. But if they want to do
the same thing with regards to religion, they can't."
The potential crisis for pastors and churches began as a challenge of the
IRS' application of the exemption in a case titled Warren vs. Commissioner
of Internal Revenue.
In a letter to readers of his Web site, www.pastors.com, Warren said his
wife, Kay, and he "decided to challenge the vagueness of the revenue
ruling that allowed agents to arbitrarily assess the value of a parsonage
without any objective standard." He is not opposed to the "fair
market rental value" clause IRS uses if the "IRS will define a
'fair' written, objective standard to be used by all IRS agents,"
said Warren, who wrote the book "Purpose Driven Church."
In May 2000, a U.S. Tax Court in California decided in Warren's favor by a
14-3 vote. The court ruled the exemption in the code is limited "to
the amount used to provide a home, not the fair market rental value of the
home." The IRS appealed the ruling to the Ninth Circuit.
Warren and his staff promoted passage of the bill. He announced May 17 at
a "Purpose-driven Church" seminar at Saddleback the president
was to sign the bill May 20. The audience of 3,800 pastors from 87
denominations broke into loud applause.
--30--
|
|